|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Background on Washington’s ESDs
- System Strengths & Weaknesses
- Long-Term Vision
- ESD Role with Current Priorities
- Keys to a More Effective System
|
|
3
|
- Legislature established ESDs as political subdivisions
- Purpose, Powers & Duties (RCW 28A 310)
- Provide cooperative & informational services
- Assist state education agencies, OSPI, State Board of Education with
constitutional duties & statutory duties
- Provide services to assure equal educational opportunity for all
students, including schools for blind & deaf
|
|
4
|
- Washington’s leadership in developing a national regional service model
- Model now found in 44 of 50 states
- Federally recognized (NCLB) for ability to serve schools
- Research cites ESD model “best idea for turning around failing schools”
(Arsen, Bell & Plank, 2003)
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Provide affordable, effective programs & service to local district
clients
- Staff expertise & technical knowledge
- Nimble & responsive to emerging needs
- Ability to quickly take programs to scale
- Strong partnerships with districts, community organizations, OSPI, State
Board of Education & other educational agencies
- A preferred provider for district professional development
- Strong relationships & knowledge of local district context
|
|
8
|
- ESDs bring $30-$60 million additional funding into the state annually to
support Washington students
- Statewide student & fiscal data cooperative funded by member
districts
- Rapid deployment & ongoing support of K-20 telecommunications
network
- Created foundation for statewide school improvement process
- ESD fiscal services have helped many districts avoid insolvency
|
|
9
|
- Administrative services for fiscal grant management, special education,
& transportation
- Curriculum services, inservice training, & assessment
- Personnel services
- Learning resource/media services
- District requested services
- Administration/non-employee related costs
|
|
10
|
- School Improvement
- Professional Development
- Programs for At-risk Youth
- Special Education Assistance
- Education Technology Training & Support
- Safety Planning
- District Support with State Standards
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Growing gap between ESDs’ statutory core responsibilities & funding
- Demands on districts have increased as ESD funding declined
- Unfunded core costs are shifted to districts & federal grants
- Erosion of state support shifted balance of ESD activities to market
driven & federal resources
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Reliance on leveraged funding creates fragmented system of ESD support
- Each ESD tailors programs to meet local market needs
- Service offerings based primarily on market viability rather than
equitable support of student learning needs
- Legislative intent of ESD system to support equal education opportunity
has been seriously eroded
|
|
15
|
- Are fully utilized as an integrated part of statewide K-12 system
- Are funded to “assure equal educational opportunity for all students” (RCW
28A 310)
- Are the primary regional delivery system to implement statewide K-12
programs
- ESDs continue bringing added funding
to support Washington education
- Implement OSPI programs with fidelity & accountability while
accommodating unique local challenges
|
|
16
|
- Washington Learns
- Improving student learning
- Support for early learning
- Dropout prevention & intervention strategies
- Creating more transparent fiscal reporting
- Other priorities
- Monitoring & support of district fiscal health
- Training to address growing needs (autism, etc.)
- Assist state with rapid data collection & analysis for critical
decisions
|
|
17
|
- ESDs used as integral part of the statewide education system
- Involved in the early stages of program design
- Seen as primary K-12 regional delivery system
- Ample funding provided for the statewide system
- ESDs provided adequate resources for effective program implementation
- Core service costs funded as essential foundation to supporting for all
schools in the state
- Broader statutory authority to better serve educational partners
|
|
18
|
- Base (Core) funding required to reestablish the regional system
- Current base funding proposed for 2007-2009: $8,019,000
- Additional funding required to rebuild system: $10,455,526
- Total request for core funding for 2007-2009: $18,474,526
|
|
19
|
|